"GRAMMAR TODAY"
♦️𝙉𝙤𝙪𝙣𝙨 𝙖𝙣𝙙 𝘼𝙙𝙟𝙚𝙘𝙩𝙞𝙫𝙚𝙨♦️
🔵𝙧𝙖𝙞𝙣 (𝙣𝙤𝙪𝙣) - 𝙧𝙖𝙞𝙣𝙮 (𝙖𝙙𝙟𝙚𝙘𝙩𝙞𝙫𝙚)
🔵𝙨𝙪𝙣 (𝙣𝙤𝙪𝙣) - 𝙨𝙪𝙣𝙣𝙮 (𝙖𝙙𝙟𝙚𝙘𝙩𝙞𝙫𝙚)
🔵𝙬𝙞𝙣𝙙 (𝙣𝙤𝙪𝙣) - 𝙬𝙞𝙣𝙙𝙮 (𝙖𝙙𝙟𝙚𝙘𝙩𝙞𝙫𝙚)
🔵𝙘𝙡𝙤𝙪𝙙 (𝙣𝙤𝙪𝙣) - 𝙘𝙡𝙤𝙪𝙙𝙮 (𝙖𝙙𝙟𝙚𝙘𝙩𝙞𝙫𝙚)
🔵𝙛𝙤𝙜 (𝙣𝙤𝙪𝙣) - 𝙛𝙤𝙜𝙜𝙮 (𝙖𝙙𝙟𝙚𝙘𝙩𝙞𝙫𝙚)
❤️𝙌𝙪𝙚𝙨𝙩𝙞𝙤𝙣𝙨 𝙖𝙗𝙤𝙪𝙩 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙬𝙚𝙖𝙩𝙝𝙚𝙧❤️
✍️𝙋𝙚𝙤𝙥𝙡𝙚 𝙘𝙤𝙢𝙢𝙤𝙣𝙡𝙮 𝙖𝙨𝙠 𝙖𝙗𝙤𝙪𝙩 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙬𝙚𝙖𝙩𝙝𝙚𝙧 𝙗𝙮 𝙨𝙖𝙮𝙞𝙣𝙜:
💕𝙒𝙝𝙖𝙩'𝙨 𝙞𝙩 𝙡𝙞𝙠𝙚 𝙤𝙪𝙩(𝙨𝙞𝙙𝙚)?
💕𝙃𝙤𝙬'𝙨 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙬𝙚𝙖𝙩𝙝𝙚𝙧?
💕𝙒𝙝𝙖𝙩'𝙨 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙬𝙚𝙖𝙩𝙝𝙚𝙧 𝙡𝙞𝙠𝙚?
💕𝙒𝙝𝙖𝙩'𝙨 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙩𝙚𝙢𝙥𝙚𝙧𝙖𝙩𝙪𝙧𝙚?
💕𝙒𝙝𝙖𝙩'𝙨 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙬𝙚𝙖𝙩𝙝𝙚𝙧 𝙛𝙤𝙧𝙚𝙘𝙖𝙨𝙩?
💕𝙒𝙝𝙖𝙩'𝙨 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙛𝙤𝙧𝙚𝙘𝙖𝙨𝙩 𝙛𝙤𝙧 𝙩𝙤𝙢𝙤𝙧𝙧𝙤𝙬?
𝙎𝙩𝙪𝙙𝙮_𝙂𝙧𝙖𝙢𝙢𝙖𝙧
𝙒𝙝𝙤 𝙫𝙨. 𝙒𝙝𝙤𝙢 𝙫𝙨.
𝙒𝙝𝙤𝙨𝙚 𝙫𝙨. 𝙒𝙝𝙤'𝙨
🔵𝙒𝙝𝙤𝙖. 𝙏𝙝𝙞𝙨 𝙤𝙣𝙚 𝙡𝙤𝙤𝙠𝙨 𝙡𝙞𝙠𝙚 𝙖 𝙗𝙞𝙩 𝙤𝙛 𝙖 𝙙𝙤𝙤𝙯𝙮. 𝙇𝙚𝙩'𝙨 𝙗𝙧𝙚𝙖𝙠 𝙞𝙩 𝙙𝙤𝙬𝙣, 𝙨𝙝𝙖𝙡𝙡 𝙬𝙚?
"𝙒𝙝𝙤" 𝙞𝙨 𝙪𝙨𝙚𝙙 𝙩𝙤 𝙞𝙙𝙚𝙣𝙩𝙞𝙛𝙮 𝙖 𝙡𝙞𝙫𝙞𝙣𝙜 𝙥𝙧𝙤𝙣𝙤𝙪𝙣. 𝙄𝙛 𝙮𝙤𝙪 𝙖𝙨𝙠𝙚𝙙, "𝙒𝙝𝙤 𝙖𝙩𝙚 𝙖𝙡𝙡 𝙤𝙛 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙘𝙤𝙤𝙠𝙞𝙚𝙨?" 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙖𝙣𝙨𝙬𝙚𝙧 𝙘𝙤𝙪𝙡𝙙 𝙗𝙚 𝙖 𝙥𝙚𝙧𝙨𝙤𝙣, 𝙡𝙞𝙠𝙚 𝙢𝙮𝙨𝙚𝙡𝙛 ("𝙄 𝙙𝙞𝙙"), 𝙤𝙧 𝙖𝙣𝙤𝙩𝙝𝙚𝙧 𝙡𝙞𝙫𝙞𝙣𝙜 𝙗𝙚𝙞𝙣𝙜 ("𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙙𝙤𝙜 𝙙𝙞𝙙").
🔵𝙃𝙚𝙮, 𝙗𝙤𝙩𝙝 𝙖𝙧𝙚 𝙧𝙚𝙖𝙡𝙞𝙨𝙩𝙞𝙘 𝙨𝙘𝙚𝙣𝙖𝙧𝙞𝙤𝙨 𝙞𝙣 𝙢𝙮 𝙬𝙤𝙧𝙡𝙙.
"w𝙝𝙤𝙢" 𝙞𝙨 𝙖 𝙡𝙞𝙩𝙩𝙡𝙚 𝙩𝙧𝙞𝙘𝙠𝙞𝙚𝙧. 𝙄𝙩'𝙨 𝙪𝙨𝙪𝙖𝙡𝙡𝙮 𝙪𝙨𝙚𝙙 𝙩𝙤 𝙙𝙚𝙨𝙘𝙧𝙞𝙗𝙚 𝙨𝙤𝙢𝙚𝙤𝙣𝙚 𝙬𝙝𝙤'𝙨 𝙧𝙚𝙘𝙚𝙞𝙫𝙞𝙣𝙜 𝙨𝙤𝙢𝙚𝙩𝙝𝙞𝙣𝙜, 𝙡𝙞𝙠𝙚 𝙖 𝙡𝙚𝙩𝙩𝙚𝙧 -- "𝙏𝙤 𝙬𝙝𝙤𝙢 𝙬𝙞𝙡𝙡 𝙞𝙩 𝙗𝙚 𝙖𝙙𝙙𝙧𝙚𝙨𝙨𝙚𝙙?" 𝘽𝙪𝙩 𝙞𝙩 𝙘𝙖𝙣 𝙖𝙡𝙨𝙤 𝙗𝙚 𝙪𝙨𝙚𝙙 𝙩𝙤 𝙙𝙚𝙨𝙘𝙧𝙞𝙗𝙚 𝙨𝙤𝙢𝙚𝙤𝙣𝙚 𝙤𝙣 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙧𝙚𝙘𝙚𝙞𝙫𝙞𝙣𝙜 𝙚𝙣𝙙 𝙤𝙛 𝙖𝙣 𝙖𝙘𝙩𝙞𝙤𝙣, 𝙡𝙞𝙠𝙚 𝙞𝙣 𝙩𝙝𝙞𝙨 𝙨𝙚𝙣𝙩𝙚𝙣𝙘𝙚:
🔵𝙒𝙝𝙤𝙢 𝙙𝙞𝙙 𝙬𝙚 𝙝𝙞𝙧𝙚 𝙩𝙤 𝙟𝙤𝙞𝙣 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙥𝙤𝙙𝙘𝙖𝙨𝙩 𝙩𝙚𝙖𝙢?
"𝙒𝙝𝙤𝙨𝙚" 𝙞𝙨 𝙪𝙨𝙚𝙙 𝙩𝙤 𝙖𝙨𝙨𝙞𝙜𝙣 𝙤𝙬𝙣𝙚𝙧𝙨𝙝𝙞𝙥 𝙩𝙤 𝙨𝙤𝙢𝙚𝙤𝙣𝙚. 𝙎𝙚𝙚 𝙞𝙛 𝙮𝙤𝙪 𝙘𝙖𝙣 𝙨𝙥𝙤𝙩 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙚𝙧𝙧𝙤𝙧 𝙞𝙣 𝙩𝙝𝙞𝙨 𝙦𝙪𝙚𝙨𝙩𝙞𝙤𝙣:
🔵𝙒𝙝𝙤'𝙨 𝙨𝙬𝙚𝙖𝙩𝙚𝙧 𝙞𝙨 𝙩𝙝𝙖𝙩?
✍️𝘽𝙚𝙘𝙖𝙪𝙨𝙚 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙨𝙬𝙚𝙖𝙩𝙚𝙧 𝙗𝙚𝙡𝙤𝙣𝙜𝙨 𝙩𝙤 𝙨𝙤𝙢𝙚𝙤𝙣𝙚, 𝙞𝙩 𝙨𝙝𝙤𝙪𝙡𝙙 𝙖𝙘𝙩𝙪𝙖𝙡𝙡𝙮 𝙗𝙚 𝙬𝙧𝙞𝙩𝙩𝙚𝙣 𝙩𝙝𝙞𝙨 𝙬𝙖𝙮:
𝙒𝙝𝙤𝙨𝙚 𝙨𝙬𝙚𝙖𝙩𝙚𝙧 𝙞𝙨 𝙩𝙝𝙖𝙩?
📌"𝙒𝙝𝙤'𝙨," 𝙤𝙣 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙤𝙩𝙝𝙚𝙧 𝙝𝙖𝙣𝙙, 𝙞𝙨 𝙪𝙨𝙚𝙙 𝙩𝙤 𝙞𝙙𝙚𝙣𝙩𝙞𝙛𝙮 𝙖 𝙡𝙞𝙫𝙞𝙣𝙜 𝙗𝙚𝙞𝙣𝙜. 𝙄𝙩'𝙨 𝙖 𝙘𝙤𝙣𝙩𝙧𝙖𝙘𝙩𝙞𝙤𝙣 𝙛𝙤𝙧 "𝙬𝙝𝙤 𝙞𝙨" -- 𝙝𝙚𝙧𝙚'𝙨 𝙖𝙣 𝙚𝙭𝙖𝙢𝙥𝙡𝙚 𝙤𝙛 𝙝𝙤𝙬 𝙬𝙚 𝙢𝙞𝙜𝙝𝙩 𝙪𝙨𝙚 𝙞𝙩 𝙞𝙣 𝙖 𝙨𝙚𝙣𝙩𝙚𝙣𝙘𝙚 𝙝𝙚𝙧𝙚 𝙞𝙣 𝘽𝙤𝙨𝙩𝙤𝙣:
♦️𝙒𝙝𝙤'𝙨 𝙥𝙞𝙩𝙘𝙝𝙞𝙣𝙜 𝙛𝙤𝙧 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙍𝙚𝙙 𝙎𝙤𝙭 𝙩𝙤𝙣𝙞𝙜𝙝𝙩?
🔵𝙎𝙚𝙚 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙙𝙞𝙛𝙛𝙚𝙧𝙚𝙣𝙘𝙚?
"𝙒𝙝𝙤𝙨𝙚" 𝙞𝙨 𝙪𝙨𝙚𝙙 𝙩𝙤 𝙛𝙞𝙜𝙪𝙧𝙚 𝙤𝙪𝙩 𝙬𝙝𝙤 𝙨𝙤𝙢𝙚𝙩𝙝𝙞𝙣𝙜 𝙗𝙚𝙡𝙤𝙣𝙜𝙨 𝙩𝙤, 𝙬𝙝𝙚𝙧𝙚𝙖𝙨 "𝙬𝙝𝙤'𝙨" 𝙞𝙨 𝙪𝙨𝙚𝙙 𝙩𝙤 𝙞𝙙𝙚𝙣𝙩𝙞𝙛𝙮 𝙨𝙤𝙢𝙚𝙤𝙣𝙚 𝙬𝙝𝙤'𝙨 𝙙𝙤𝙞𝙣𝙜 𝙨𝙤𝙢𝙚𝙩𝙝𝙞𝙣𝙜.
𝙃𝙖𝙥𝙥𝙮 𝙇𝙚𝙖𝙧𝙣𝙞𝙣𝙜 ☺️💕
VOCABULARY
𝙒𝙚𝙖𝙩𝙝𝙚𝙧, 𝙒𝙚𝙖𝙩𝙝𝙚𝙧 𝙛𝙤𝙧𝙚𝙘𝙖𝙨𝙩 – 𝙑𝙤𝙘𝙖𝙗𝙪𝙡𝙖𝙧𝙮 𝙇𝙞𝙨𝙩
𝙒𝙚𝙖𝙩𝙝𝙚𝙧 𝙛𝙤𝙧𝙚𝙘𝙖𝙨𝙩
💕(𝙛𝙡𝙖𝙨𝙝 𝙤𝙛) 𝙡𝙞𝙜𝙝𝙩𝙣𝙞𝙣𝙜
💕𝙗𝙡𝙞𝙯𝙯𝙖𝙧𝙙
💕𝙘𝙡𝙤𝙪𝙙
💕𝙙𝙧𝙤𝙪𝙜𝙝𝙩
💕𝙙𝙧𝙮 𝙨𝙚𝙖𝙨𝙤𝙣
💕𝙛𝙤𝙜
💕𝙛𝙧𝙤𝙨𝙩
💕𝙝𝙚𝙖𝙩
💕𝙝𝙪𝙧𝙧𝙞𝙘𝙖𝙣𝙚
💕𝙞𝙘𝙚
💕𝙢𝙖𝙭𝙞𝙢𝙪𝙢 𝙩𝙚𝙢𝙥𝙚𝙧𝙖𝙩𝙪𝙧𝙚
💕𝙢𝙞𝙣𝙞𝙢𝙪𝙢 𝙩𝙚𝙢𝙥𝙚𝙧𝙖𝙩𝙪𝙧𝙚
💕𝙢𝙞𝙨𝙩
💕𝙧𝙖𝙞𝙣
💕𝙧𝙖𝙞𝙣𝙮 𝙨𝙚𝙖𝙨𝙤𝙣
💕𝙨𝙘𝙖𝙩𝙩𝙚𝙧𝙚𝙙 𝙨𝙝𝙤𝙬𝙚𝙧𝙨
💕𝙨𝙝𝙤𝙬𝙚𝙧
💕𝙨𝙣𝙤𝙬
💕𝙨𝙩𝙤𝙧𝙢
💕𝙨𝙪𝙣
💕𝙨𝙪𝙣𝙣𝙮 𝙞𝙣𝙩𝙚𝙧𝙫𝙖𝙡𝙨
💕𝙨𝙪𝙣𝙣𝙮 𝙨𝙥𝙚𝙡𝙡
💕𝙩𝙝𝙪𝙣𝙙𝙚𝙧
💕𝙩𝙝𝙪𝙣𝙙𝙚𝙧𝙨𝙩𝙤𝙧𝙢
💕𝙩𝙤𝙧𝙣𝙖𝙙𝙤, 𝙩𝙬𝙞𝙨𝙩𝙚𝙧
💕𝙬𝙞𝙣𝙙
0 Comments